Web Indicators for Research Evaluation . Part 3 : Books and Non - Standard Outputs
نویسندگان
چکیده
This literature review describes web indicators for the impact of books, software, datasets, videos and other non-standard academic outputs. Although journal articles dominate academic research in the health and natural sciences, other types of outputs can make equally valuable contributions to scholarship and are more common in other fields. It is not always possible to get useful citation-based impact indicators for these due to their absence from, or incomplete coverage in, traditional citation indexes. In this context, the web is particularly valuable as a potential source of impact indicators for non-standard academic outputs. The main focus in this review is on books because of the much greater amount of relevant research for them and because they are regarded as particularly valuable in the arts and humanities and in some areas of the social sciences.
منابع مشابه
مقایسه فرصتهای دگرسنجی و تحلیل استنادی در ارزیابی پژوهش
The present study atempts to explain the strengths of altmetrics and compare them with those of citation-based indicators, and thereby reveal opportunities provided by social web in research evaluation.Applying a qualitative thematic analysis method, it studied the contents of research and theoretical works about the citation and altmetrics indicators in order to extract their authors’ views ab...
متن کاملDesigning and Evaluating a Conceptual Model of Credibility Evaluation of Web Information: a Meta-synthesis and Delphi Study
Background and Aim: The current research aims to develop a literature-dependent and expert-modified model related to credibility evaluation of web information. Methods: Regarding the approach, mixed method would be utilized. The research method then is mixed-heuristic using both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. In the first stage of the research, meta- synthesis was used as a qualita...
متن کاملIndicators for tracking programmes to strengthen health research capacity in lower- and middle-income countries: a qualitative synthesis
BACKGROUND The monitoring and evaluation of health research capacity strengthening (health RCS) commonly involves documenting activities and outputs using indicators or metrics. We sought to catalogue the types of indicators being used to evaluate health RCS and to assess potential gaps in quality and coverage. METHODS We purposively selected twelve evaluations to maximize diversity in health...
متن کاملScientific Outputs on Cyberchondria: scientometric, Altmetric and Researchers’ Sciencitifc Collaboration Network Analysis
Introduction:Cyberchondria can be considered one of the emerging challenges in the age of the Internet. The aim of this study was to to investigate the scientific productivity and analyze the collaboration network of authors in the cyberchondria field in the Web of Science (WoS). Methods:To conduct this research, scientometric, altmetrics and social network analysis indicators were utilized. A...
متن کاملInformation Seeking Behavior versus Scientific Publication Behavior: An infodemiological study on prostate cancer
Background and Aim: The current study aimed to investigate the state of health information supply and demand on prostate cancer among Iranian medical researchers and Iranian web users during 2011 to 2015. The purpose of this study, based on infodemiology indicators, was to investigate the alignment of health information supply and demand on prostate cancer among Iranian medical researchers and ...
متن کامل